With the possibility of a second Trump presidency on the horizon, European banks face fresh challenges as Wall Street eyes a potential new wave of deregulation. For European lenders that have long lagged behind U.S. competitors in profitability and market share, this shift in the regulatory landscape could tilt the balance further in favor of their American counterparts, especially in the arena of investment banking. This article delves into the potential impacts of a Trump 2.0 presidency on European and U.S. banks, exploring how financial deregulation in the U.S. may impact global banking dynamics and what European institutions may consider in response.
A History of Competition and Challenges in Profitability
Since the 2008-09 financial crisis, European banks have grappled with weak profitability and subdued economic growth. In contrast, U.S. banks have surged in both value and market share. Key players on Wall Street have capitalized on stronger economies and more favorable regulatory environments, enabling them to expand services and capture more clients. European banks, meanwhile, have often struggled to retain and expand their customer base, particularly in investment banking, where they have pulled back due to restrictive regulations and structural challenges.
The gap is striking: while U.S. banks have seen a tripling in share values since 2010, European banking stocks have declined by roughly 10% over the same period. The European Central Bank (ECB) estimates that the average return on equity for eurozone banks hovers around 5%, compared to approximately 10% for U.S. banks. This disparity largely results from regulatory differences, higher fee income in the U.S., and lingering issues with non-performing loans in Europe.
Some European banks, however, were beginning to show signs of improvement. For instance, until recently, European banking stocks outperformed U.S. counterparts on the DJUSBK index, raising hopes that the U.S. would adopt elements of the Basel III framework. The Basel III regulations require banks to hold more capital, a move seen as helping to level the playing field between the two regions. However, the recent election outcome in the U.S. and the possibility of a new Trump administration have raised concerns that these hopes could be short-lived. U.S. banks are now expected to benefit from a relaxed regulatory environment, positioning them for rapid growth that European banks may struggle to match under their current restrictions.
What Deregulation Could Mean for U.S. Banks
Should Trump return to office, experts believe that his administration will seek to enact pro-business, deregulatory policies. This would likely include revisiting the Dodd-Frank Act, a piece of legislation passed in 2010 to increase financial stability by imposing stricter requirements on banks. If parts of Dodd-Frank are rolled back, U.S. banks could see significant benefits, including more flexibility in lending and the ability to pursue mergers and acquisitions more freely.
Michael Ashley Schulman, Chief Investment Officer at Running Point Capital Advisors, predicts that a Trump administration would ease capital requirements, making it easier for U.S. banks to extend credit, streamline operations, and increase lending volumes. Schulman also expects an increase in mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. banking sector due to reduced scrutiny from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). These relaxed regulations could boost investment banking fees for U.S. firms, allowing them to attract new clients and further increase profitability.
In addition to changes in M&A regulations, the new administration may also seek to appoint Republican-leaning regulators to oversee banking policies. These officials may favor easing capital requirements, loosening merger restrictions, and even revisiting controversial Basel III reforms. For U.S. banks, this potential regulatory shift could create new opportunities to innovate, take on more risk, and grow their businesses. However, this anticipated wave of deregulation may leave European banks competing at a disadvantage.
European Banks’ Struggles and Potential Responses
For European banks, which operate under stringent regulatory requirements and lower interest rates, competing with deregulated U.S. banks could pose a serious challenge. With limited flexibility in capital and loan management, European banks may find it increasingly difficult to compete, particularly in investment banking. This is especially concerning as European banks still struggle with legacy non-performing loans, regulatory constraints, and relatively lower returns on equity.
In light of these developments, some European banks may consider lobbying for looser regulations within the eurozone and the United Kingdom. Certain industry leaders argue that if the U.S. banking environment becomes significantly more favorable, European policymakers may need to adjust their stance to ensure competitiveness. According to one European banking executive, there is a belief that deregulation in the U.S. could provide European banks with leverage to advocate for less restrictive regulations in Europe.
Swiss Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter has already indicated that European policymakers are paying close attention to the evolving U.S. banking landscape. She recently discussed the implications of possible U.S. deregulation with her British counterpart Rachel Reeves, highlighting the importance of balancing competitiveness with financial stability. While these discussions may be preliminary, they reflect an awareness among European leaders of the need to adapt their regulatory stance in response to global changes.
Potential Benefits for International Banks Operating in the U.S.
While European banks may struggle to match the advantages enjoyed by their U.S. counterparts, some international institutions with substantial operations in the United States could benefit from Trump’s pro-business policies. Major European banks like Barclays, Deutsche Bank, and UBS, which maintain a significant presence in the U.S., could experience positive impacts if deregulation fosters a more favorable business environment.
Filippo Maria Alloatti, Head of Financials Credit at Federated Hermes, believes that international banks with strong U.S. operations are well-positioned to benefit from the expected policy shift. These banks may experience increased growth in their American divisions, as relaxed regulations allow for expanded operations and potentially higher returns.
While these institutions may benefit from the anticipated deregulatory wave, most European banks, especially those without significant U.S. operations, will likely face greater challenges. They must either find ways to boost their competitiveness under existing regulations or hope that European regulators implement changes that level the playing field. In the meantime, U.S. banks, bolstered by favorable domestic policies, are poised to make substantial gains in profitability and market share.
What Does the Future Hold?
The pace of deregulation under a potential Trump presidency would depend on the new administration’s key regulatory appointments and the policies enacted. While it is possible that the U.S. may pursue aggressive deregulation, the extent of these changes remains uncertain. Additionally, any U.S. policy changes will inevitably impact global financial markets, and European policymakers will need to consider their own response to ensure that their banks remain competitive.
There is no doubt that Europe’s financial sector will closely monitor developments in the U.S. banking industry. If regulatory discrepancies between the two regions grow, European banks may need to explore strategic changes to remain competitive. This could involve investing in new technologies, expanding their footprint in high-growth markets, or pursuing lobbying efforts to encourage more favorable regulations.
Ultimately, the outcome of these changes will depend on a variety of factors, including the specific policies enacted by a new Trump administration and the response of European regulators. As European banks weigh their options, one question looms large: how can they navigate a shifting financial landscape and continue to serve as competitive global players in an increasingly deregulated world?
Conclusion
The potential return of Trump to the White House presents both challenges and opportunities for banks on both sides of the Atlantic. While U.S. banks stand to benefit from anticipated deregulation, European banks may find themselves facing an uphill battle. As the global financial industry braces for change, European institutions will need to strategize, innovate, and potentially advocate for regulatory shifts to remain viable in an environment that could increasingly favor their American rivals.
With European policymakers and banking executives already discussing potential responses to U.S. deregulation, it remains to be seen how the European financial sector will adapt. Will European banks successfully find ways to level the playing field, or will they be left behind as U.S. banks push forward in a more permissive regulatory landscape? The coming years will reveal how these forces shape the future of global banking and financial competition.
The post Europe’s Banks Brace for Fierce Competition Under Potential Trump 2.0 Presidency appeared first on World Finance Council.